Proskauer’s 20th Annual Trick or Treat Seminar was held on Friday, October 30.
The Seminar discussed:
- Non-Profit Revitalization Act of 2013: Recent Developments and Outstanding Issues
- Recent Developments in Independent Contractor Misclassification
- Purpose Investing for Charities
- Benefits Update
Amanda Nussbaum welcomed everyone to the 20th Annual Trick or Treat Seminar, commented on some of the trends in nonprofit law over the last twenty years, and introduced the presenters.
On October 26, 2015, the IRS released final regulations under Sections 141 and 145 of the Internal Revenue Code concerning the use of property financed with tax-exempt bond proceeds. The bulk of the new regulations fill a long-reserved spot in Treasury Regulation Section 1.141-6 concerning allocation of bond proceeds to financed property. In addition, in an important new development, amendments to Treasury Regulations Sections 1.141-3 and 1.145-2 now provide that partnerships that include governmental entities or Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations can use and own bond-financed property. Permitted use is in proportion to the exempt’s ownership of the joint venture, except to the extent that the use generates unrelated business income for the exempt joint venturer. The new regulations can be applied to outstanding bonds as well as new bonds.
As we previously reported, the IRS has updated its guidance with helpful examples concerning program-related investments for private foundations. In its recently issued Notice 2015-62, the IRS provides further assurance that private foundations may take the accomplishment of charitable purposes into account in investing decisions, in addition to financial return.
Among other restrictions, private foundations are subject to Section 4944 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 4944 imposes excise taxes on a private foundation that makes a “jeopardizing investment,” as well as on the foundation’s directors, officers, and management who knowingly participate in the making of the investment. Jeopardizing investments do not include “program-related investments.” These are investments made without any significant purpose of financial return. Notice 2015-62 does not address program-related investments; rather, it addresses investments having a charitable as well as financial purpose.
On September 16, 2015, the IRS issued proposed regulations concerning the time and manner for donee organizations to file information returns that report required information about charitable contributions. The proposed regulations would implement an exception to the requirement that a taxpayer who claims a charitable contribution deduction for any contribution of $250 or more to obtain substantiation in the form of a “contemporaneous written acknowledgement” from the donee organization.
Previously, some taxpayers have argued that donations can be substantiated by filing an amended Form 990, even years after the claimed donation is made; however, the IRS has rejected this position. Instead, pursuant to the proposed regulations, the IRS will develop an optional “specific-use information return for donee reporting” intended to provide for timely reporting, while also minimizing reporting burdens on donees and protecting donor privacy.
In April, the New York State Attorney General’s office released guidance addressing key provisions of the New York Not-for-Profit Corporation Law. For in-depth analysis of the Attorney General’s guidance, click here for an article by Proskauer attorneys Roger Cohen and Ellen Moskowitz. For this blog’s coverage of the New York Not-for-Profit Corporation law, click here.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has issued an exposure draft of a Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities, which would make significant changes to the current reporting rules. The FASB believes that each of the proposed changes will improve the usefulness of the information provided to stakeholders, reduce the complexity of reporting, or both. One significant focus of the changes is to make clear which funds are available for expenditure in the organization’s discretion and which are not. Continue Reading
On March 31, 2015, the Commissioner of the IRS reported in a speech to the National Press Club that the IRS is “under new management” due to major changes in management staff over the last few years. Many of these management changes, as well as changes in organization and procedures, were in the Tax-Exempt and Governmental Entities (TEGE) branch of the IRS.
Organizational Changes. Previously, an Exempt Organizations Rulings and Agreements branch was responsible for issuing exemption determination letters. This function was headquartered in Cincinnati but several types of applications were required to be referred to an EO Technical branch in Washington (formerly referred to as the National Office). EO Technical also issued private letter rulings and gave technical advice. This was unlike other branches of the IRS. Elsewhere branches of the IRS Chief Counsel’s office, rather than technical staff reporting to the associate commissioners, were responsible for the private letter ruling and technical advice function. In Announcement 2014-34, the IRS explained that its Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (TE/GE) was being realigned. Technical responsibility for preparing technical advice and private letter rulings, as well as revenue rulings, revenue procedures, announcements, and notices, was shifted to TEGE Counsel effective January 2, 2015. The EO Rulings and Agreements branch will retain its authority to issue determination letters approving or denying tax-exempt status as well as miscellaneous determinations addressed in Form 8940. Continue Reading
Late last year, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued a letter ruling, PLR 201446025, providing that, in certain instances, a nonprofit corporation exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and incorporated in State A was not required to file a new application for tax-exempt status (IRS Form 1023) when it changed its domicile to State B by filing “Articles of Domestication” in State B and “Articles of Conversion” in State A.
In the ruling, the law of State B stated that the corporation’s filing of “Articles of Domestication” would not affect its original incorporation date. The law of State B also stated that the corporation would be considered the same corporation as the one that existed under the laws of State A, the state in which the corporation was previously domiciled. Similarly, the governing law of State A stated that following the corporation’s filing of “Articles of Conversion,” the corporation would continue to exist without interruption and be able to maintain its same liabilities and obligations.
Proskauer’s 19th Annual Trick or Treat Seminar was held on Friday, October 31.
The Seminar discussed:
- Charitable giving techniques
- Labor and employment issues with using volunteers and interns
- Recent developments in employee benefits
In her introductory remarks, Amanda Nussbaum discussed recent tax developments, including the development of IRS Form 1023-EZ, the process for reinstatement of tax-exempt status, and the proposed regulations under Section 501(c)(4), and introduced the presenters. Continue Reading
Our work on behalf of our client, Angkor Hospital for Children (“AHC”), in Siem Reap, Cambodia, reached a milestone with a New York Supreme Court order on September 15, 2014, transferring all the assets from a New York not-for-profit organization, Friends Without a Border (“FWAB”), to a Hong Kong company limited by guarantee, Angkor Hospital for Children Limited (“AHC HK”), established for charitable purposes.
AHC, located in Siem Reap, Cambodia was founded by photographer Kenro Izu in gratitude for the inspiration he received from the country’s ancient monuments, which he captured in his photographic series “Light Over Ancient Angkor.” Being Cambodia’s first teaching hospital, one of only two in the country, AHC draws patients who suffer from serious illness and often from acute malnutrition as well. They travel for hours, or even days, usually from rural areas, seeking higher level care that cannot be found in their own communities. AHC not only provides the neediest of these patients with free treatment, but also reimburses their travel costs in order to ensure that they will not hesitate to seek care when it is needed. AHC has also established a satellite clinic in the district town of Sotnikum in order to reach a larger number of poor children in the rural communities. Between AHC and the satellite clinic, over 150,000 children are treated each year.