Applying for Tax Exemption? Toy with the IRS at Your Peril

The Tax Court recently delivered some sound advice – do not play “cat and mouse” with the IRS.  In Ohio Disability Association v. Commissioner, a Tax Court Memo filed November 12, 2009, the Tax Court rejected the petitioner’s request for a declaratory judgment that it qualified as a public charity.  The court’s rejection was based on its inability to conclude that the organization would operate exclusively for exempt purposes.

The opinion is instructive on how not to deal with the IRS in the exemption process.  Organizations seeking IRS recognition of tax exemption (which is required of almost all charities, except for churches) must file a 26-page Form 1023, which is explained in 38 pages of instructions.  The IRS also has extensive questions and answers further explaining Form 1023.

Notwithstanding the broad scope of the questions on the Form 1023, it is quite typical to receive further extensive questions from the IRS following its review of the Form 1023 submission package.  These questions usually seek elaboration on the current and proposed activities of the organization, compensation structure, information about the Board members, copies of documents referred to in the application (e.g., bond offering, leases, and employment agreements).  Some practitioners sometimes treat these supplemental IRS questions in a cavalier manner, considering them a nuisance.  This type of response is a mistake, as the petitioner in Ohio Disability Association v. Commissioner learned.  At a minimum, responding to IRS questions in this manner often leads to extensive delay in obtaining an IRS exemption letter.

Continue Reading...

With the New Form 990, Directors and Trustees Must Complete a Complicated Disclosure Form

The IRS completely redesigned Form 990, the Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax, to be filed for calendar year 2008 and subsequent periods.  This Form is filed by most tax-exempt organizations and is open to public inspection.  One stated purpose of the makeover was to increase transparency and disclosure of exempt organization operations, thereby improving governance and highlighting conflicts of interest and insider dealings.  One major change in the Form is that it requires extensive reporting concerning the organization’s governance and management policies, the independence of its board, and board members’ and key employees’ family and business relationships with each other and with the reporting organization.

Organizations that report on a calendar year basis will already have filed their first year of the new form and at this point should review their information-gathering procedures to identify any needed improvements.  Organizations that have a June 30 year-end either will already have filed with the new form for the period ending June 30, 2009 or will be in an extension period for filing.  Organizations that have not yet filed the new form should be reviewing their disclosure questionnaires to make sure they are collecting all needed information.

Continue Reading...

President Obama Signs Bill Allowing 2009 Charitable Deductions for 2010 Haiti Donations

On Friday, January 22, 2010, President Obama signed into law a bill allowing taxpayers who made charitable contributions to the Haiti earthquake relief efforts to claim an itemizable deduction on their 2009 Tax Returns instead of waiting until next year to claim the deduction. 

The legislation also includes a provision that allows individuals who sent their contributions via text message to use their phone bills as proof of their contribution.  The bill must contain the name of the charitable organization and the date and amount of the contribution. 

The legislation was introduced by Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles B. Rangel (D-NY) and a host of other co-sponsors.  Though not obligated to do so, charities assisting in the Haiti relief effort may want to make their donors aware of the possibility of the acceleration of deductions.

The IRS also announced on Friday that it has issued guidance designating the Haiti earthquake as a natural disaster for federal tax purposes.  The guidance allows recipients of qualified disaster relief payments to exclude those payments from income tax.  The guidance also allows employer-sponsored private foundations to assist employee victims in areas affected by the earthquake in Haiti without affecting their tax-exempt status.

For additional information on disaster relief, please refer to the IRS Publication 3833 on Disaster Relief and other disaster relief resources for charities and contributors on the IRS website.

SEI Reports on Nonprofit Response to Investment Challenges

SEI reports that a recent poll shows a continued commitment to alternative investments by nonprofit organizations, including educational institutions, hospitals, private foundations, and community foundations.  Conducted in December, 2009, the poll looked into the current investment management practices of nonprofit organizations, the challenges these organizations are facing, and how these organizations are prioritizing and addressing these concerns for 2010. 

 

The poll states that only six percent of the nonprofit organizations that responded plan to decrease their overall allocation to alternative assets, such as hedge, private equity, real estate, venture capital, and other privately offered funds. 

 

Despite this statistic, the poll is not all good news for the private funds industry.  The poll also shows that a significant percentage of its respondents will be addressing liquidity concerns by aligning portions of their portfolio with spending requirements (49%), developing a formal liquidity policy (36%), shifting assets into short-term fixed income (35%), decreasing liquidity and lock-up tolerance for alternatives (29%), and attempting to negotiate shorter lock-up periods (28%).

Continue Reading...

Tax Exemption Changes Possible for Hospitals as Part of Health Reform

Section 9007 of the health reform bill passed by the Senate on December 24, 2009 contains specific requirements for Section 501(c)(3) hospitals wishing to retain their tax exemption.  This development is of interest to all exempt organizations, not just hospitals, because it is another example of Congressional action imposing specific standards on particular types of exempt organizations (such as Section 501(q), added by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 to address credit counseling organizations). 

Its provisions also increase requirements for exempt hospitals’ transparency and public accountability, a favorite topic of Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) of the Senate Finance Committee, and is another indication that scrutiny of tax-exempt organizations is unlikely to abate.  Senator Grassley has recently issued two releases on rising college tuition, high not-for-profit executive compensation, and the need for governance transparency

Continue Reading...

IRS Issues Audit Checklist for Exempt Organization Governance

Over the past few years, the IRS has become increasingly interested in monitoring the governance practices of tax-exempt organizations, particularly public charities. This interest has been shown through public statements of IRS officials, the addition of questions about board makeup and policies to the Form 990, an explanation of why the IRS considers governance important, and the development of training materials on governance for IRS personnelNot all members of the exempt organizations community agree that the IRS should focus on governance.  However, the IRS rationale is that a well-governed organization is a tax-compliant organization. 

The IRS has now developed and released a governance issues checklist (the Governance Check Sheet) to be completed in each audit of an exempt organization. The checklist provides a very specific roadmap for exempt organizations to compare their practices and policies with what the IRS wants to see and to make adjustments where necessary.

Continue Reading...

IRS Lists Organizations Now Classified as Private Foundations

In Announcement 2009-88, set to be published in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2009-52, dated December 28, 2009, the IRS lists organizations that have failed to establish or have been unable to maintain their status as public charities or as private operating foundations.

Accordingly, grantors and contributors to these organizations may no longer rely on previous rulings or designations in the IRS's Cumulative List of Organizations (Publication 78), or on the presumption arising from the filing of notices under Section 508(b) of the Code. 

 

Notably, the listing does not indicate that the organizations have lost their status as organizations described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code, which are eligible to receive deductible contributions.  Instead, these organizations are simply no longer public charities.

 

Continue reading for the full text of the Announcement.

Continue Reading...

Independent ACORN Report Says Lax Governance, Rapid Growth Set Stage For Video Controversy

In September, 2009, Proskauer, by way of Scott Harshbarger, was retained by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (“ACORN”) to conduct an independent analysis of the videos that caused this summer’s uproar as well as the organization as a whole, including its core weaknesses and inherent strengths. Our report on ACORN, which was publicly issued on December 7, 2009, can be found here

The hidden camera controversy has been perceived by many as a third strike against ACORN on the heels of the disclosure in June, 2008 of an embezzlement cover-up, which triggered the firing of ACORN’s founder, and the allegations of voter registration fraud during the 2008 election, done in collaboration with a separate entity, Project Vote.  It erupted just as ACORN’s reform leadership was about to complete an ambitious and professionally directed organizational and cultural transformation designed to revisit its mission, reshape its scope and charter, and squarely meet its legal, governance, and compliance responsibilities. 

The serious management challenges detailed in our report are the fault of ACORN’s founder and a cadre of leaders who, in their drive for growth, failed to commit the organization to the basic, appropriate standards of governance and accountability.  As a result, ACORN not only fell short of living its principles but also left itself vulnerable to public embarrassment.

See how your organization can learn from ACORN's past failures.

Continue Reading...

IRS Releases its Priority Guidance Plan for 2009-2010

On November 24, 2009, the IRS issued its Priority Guidance Plan for 2009-2010.  The Plan contains 315 projects to be completed over a twelve-month period from July, 2009 through June, 2010. 

Continue Reading...

Parsonage: Are Clerics Employees or Self-Employed?

Parsonage is a seemingly innocuous five line tax benefit in the Code.  This "innocent" provision of the Code, Section 107, appears to have befuddled many ministers and their professional advisors, however.

 

About 90 years ago, Congress promulgated an exclusion from income for the rental value of the housing provided to a “minister of the gospel,” which includes priests, rabbis, imams and any other duly ordained, commissioned or licensed member of the clergy.  Alternatively, the minister can exclude the rental allowance paid as part of compensation, to the extent actually used as rent or other costs of home ownership.  Since 2002, the allowance is capped at fair rental value, including furnishings and appurtenances (such as a garage), plus the cost of utilities.

 

While there are IRS publications that explain the tax nuances of parsonage (e.g., Publication 517 and The Tax Guide for Churches and Religious Organizations), the unusual tax treatment of ministers can still be very confusing.

Continue Reading...