IRS Filings

Subscribe to IRS Filings via RSS

The IRS recently unveiled its new streamlined online search tool, Exempt Organizations Select Check (“EO Select Check”), which provides one place where taxpayers can go to find out: (1) whether an organization is eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions; (2) whether the organization has ever been subject to automatic revocation of its tax-exempt status for failing to file a required Form 990, Form 990-EZ or Form 990-N (aka, the “e-Postcard”) for three consecutive years; and (3) whether a small organization has filed the e-Postcard. Previously, taxpayers had to utilize three separate online search sites to find this information (the electronic version of Publication 78 (i.e., the list of exempt organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions), the online Auto-Revocation List and the e-Postcard database).…

A new provision which was slipped in to the annual announcement of procedures for exempt organization determinations and letter rulings provides a way for governmental entities to voluntarily terminate their Section 501(c)(3) status. This is important for governmental hospitals that otherwise could be faced with new exemption requirements and penalties.
…

The IRS has granted an automatic extension for certain tax-exempt organizations to file their annual returns electronically. The extension is being provided because the IRS’s electronic filing system (the “Modernized eFile system” or “MeF”) will not be available for filing Forms 990, 990-EZ, 990-PF, and 1120-POL from January 1, 2012 through February 29, 2012 (the “Suspension Period”). The extension is only available for organizations with filing due dates (whether original or extended) during the Suspension Period (“Affected Organizations”). Ordinarily, organizations with a fiscal year ending August 31 or September 30 would have filing deadlines during the Suspension Period. Under Notice 2012-4, Affected Organizations will automatically be granted an extension of time to file electronically to March 30, 2012.
…

Treasury just released the 2011–2012 Priority Guidance Plan. The Plan lists 317 projects that are priorities for Treasury resources through June 2012. Included in these projects are 13 projects directly related to Exempt Organizations. Many of the other projects such as the 66 employee benefits, executive compensation and employment taxes may affect Exempt Organizations.
…

The IRS recently released a new list of FAQ and tips for Part VI of Form 990, which requires an exempt organization to provide certain information about its governing board and management, as well as its governance policies and disclosure practices. 

               Of particular interest is the clarification that questions in Section B (about whether an exempt organization has adopted certain governance policies such as a written conflict of interest policy and a written whistleblower policy) may be answered affirmatively if a committee of the board with the power to do so has approved such policies by the close of the tax year. This should come as welcome news to those exempt organizations that reacted negatively to a 2010 revision to the instructions, which stated that an organization should only answer yes to these questions if its entire governing board adopted the policies. Some exempt organizations complained that requiring full board approval was in contrast to their usual practice of delegating the authority to adopt such policies to a committee of the governing board. An IRS official indicated earlier this week that in addition to making this point clear in the new FAQ, the IRS will be revising the 2011 instructions to Form 990 accordingly. 

Some of the other key points of guidance in the new FAQ are highlighted below:

In a tightly written plain English opinion, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in Polm Family Foundation v. U.S. explained an important requirement of Type II supporting organizations.

To be a Type II supporting organization, a charity must satisfy three tests:

 

1.                  the organizational test set forth in IRC Section 509(a)(3)(A),

2.                  the relationship test set forth in IRC Section 509(a)(3)(B)(ii), and

3.                  the control test set forth in IRC Section 509(a)(3)(C).

While the district court  concluded that the charity failed both the relationship test and the control test, the Court of Appeals based its decision on the failure to satisfy the organizational test. The Court said that this test was the most straightforward. 

 

At a recent conference on nonprofit governance sponsored by Georgetown Law Center, an IRS official stated that fringe benefits have become the most common trigger of intermediate sanctions under Section 4958 of the Code. 

As most of you know, or should know, Section 4958 of the Code, enacted in 1996, imposes excise taxes on both “disqualified persons” who receive an “excess benefit” from an exempt organization and any organization manager who knowingly participates in an excess benefit transaction. 

When an economic benefit is not treated as compensation by the organization, the benefit is presumed to constitute an excess benefit transaction in its entirety, unless the disqualified person can establish that it was properly excludable from income for income tax purposes, or involved a legitimate non-compensatory transaction with the organization. 

In February of 2010, the IRS began its first Employment Tax National Research Project in 25 years. This three-year “study” focuses on uncollected taxes in the area of employment for both taxable and exempt entities. As part of this study, 2,000 taxpayers are being selected each year for a comprehensive audit. Fringe benefits are one of the main areas of focus in these audits, making this a priority issue for the IRS.